一人游 Talk.01 Solo Journey Talk.01 第 02 篇 Section 02
围棋与竞技 Go and Competitive Sports
返回 一人游 Talk.01 Back to Solo Journey Talk.01本文目录 Contents
3、围棋的饭圈化：以战鹰现象为例 The Fandomization of Go: The Zhan Ying Phenomenon
战鹰是中国围棋职业选手，去年年底走红，如今已是B站全站直播前五的大主播，一晚直播流水可达数十万元。她的直播风格颇为”抽象”——这并非节目效果，她本人就是如此纯真而抽象，这种纯真带来的反差感构成了她的吸引力，也把原本属于乐子人和虚拟主播圈层的观众吸引进了围棋圈。
Zhan Ying is a Chinese professional Go player who exploded into viral fame late last year. Today she stands among the top five live streamers on Bilibili, with nightly live-stream turnover reaching hundreds of thousands of yuan. Her streaming demeanor is notoriously “absurdist”—not an engineered gimmick, but a manifestation of her unvarnished, bizarre innocence. The dissonance born of this purity drives her magnetic charm, drawing audiences who watch for amusement and viewers from VTuber circles into the Go orbit.
由此，围棋评论区的戾气肉眼可见地多了起来。我反感把围棋搞成饭圈这一套，原因在于二者的底层逻辑并不兼容。饭圈成立有一个前提：低门槛与审美多元——任何人都可以发言，任何人总能找到自己喜欢的对象，当然这也导致饭圈内部冲突频繁。而围棋恰恰相反：它本身门槛很高，不具备网络传播所需的快速消费属性，并不符合饭圈的要求。更重要的是，围棋万变不离其宗，赢棋就是硬道理；棋手无论高矮胖瘦、性格如何，最终还是要看棋盘上的发挥。
Consequently, hostility within Go comment sections has surged visibly. I detest the importation of celebrity fandom culture into Go because their foundational premises are fundamentally irreconcilable. Idol fandom requires low barriers to entry and pluralistic aesthetics: anyone can voice an opinion, everyone can latch onto a bias, inevitably fueling toxic internecine factionalism. Go is the antithesis: intellectually formidable, devoid of the fast-consumption qualities demanded by internet virality, and refractory to idol idolatry. Above all, Go’s eternal axiom is absolute: victory is the only currency. Regardless of stature, charisma, or persona, what ultimately matters is the player’s performance on the board.
如今战鹰把这批新观众引入围棋圈，其中没有围棋基础的人占绝大多数。他们对围棋的关注并非以棋局内容为基础，而是以对棋手的”幻想”为基础：他们认定自己喜欢、支持的棋手一定会赢；一旦输棋，他们不去看内容本身，而是盯着AI胜率开始谩骂——问题是，他们真的懂AI胜率吗？结果就是，围棋的热度上来了，讨论棋局本身的评论反而少了。
Now Zhan Ying has ushered a deluge of newcomers into the Go world, the overwhelming majority possessing zero fundamental comprehension of the game. Their engagement is rooted not in evaluating moves, but in parasocial fantasies: they dogmatically assume their favored idol must prevail; upon defeat, rather than parsing tactical substance, they fixate on AI win-rate graphs and launch vitriolic abuse—yet do they even comprehend AI evaluations? The resulting paradox is acute: while Go trends online, serious dialogue analyzing actual games has dwindled.
这几天中韩围棋世界冠军决赛在重庆举行，由中国主办，中国排名第五的棋手被韩国排名第三的棋手以0:2击败。输棋本身并不可怕，可怕的是舆论的反应：那些人先是攻击”中国第五”，然后沿着排名一个一个往上骂，柯洁自然也被骂惨；接着开始阴阳怪气地暗示中国棋手靠作弊进入决赛，再转向攻击国家队体制和协会，最后落脚于辱骂韩国人。我实在不理解，为什么现在讨论任何事情都要扯上政治与国家，尤其是许多人根本没有思考就胡乱开喷。
Recently, a Sino-Korean World Go Championship final unfolded in Chongqing, hosted by China. China’s fifth-ranked pro was swept 0-2 by Korea’s third-ranked player. Defeat itself is unremarkable; terrifying was the public reaction. Commentators first attacked China’s No. 5, then hurled vitriol up the domestic ranking ladder, Ke Jie predictably catching vicious flak. Next, cynical conspiracists insinuated Chinese pros had cheated their way into the finals, then pivoted to excoriate the national training apparatus and the association, ultimately culminating in xenophobic slurs against Koreans. I cannot fathom why every modern topic must be conflated with nationalist politics, particularly when so many spew venom without an ounce of independent thought.
我的判断是：中国十四亿人看起来关注政治的很多，但其中95%以上只是借此机会宣泄情绪罢了；剩下的5%中，与政治真正存在利益关系的人只占一部分，能够影响政治的就更少了。当然，韩国人也有类似的问题——韩网上无脑辱骂宋雨琦的言论也不在少数。与其如此，不如好好欣赏舞台物料、好好看棋。
My assessment stands: among China’s 1.4 billion populace, countless seem fixated on state politics, yet over 95% merely use it as an opportunity to vent emotions. Of the remaining 5%, only a fraction holds tangible stakes in policy, and those capable of influencing outcomes are infinitesimal. South Korea exhibits symmetrical pathologies—mindless internet abuse targeting Yuqi on Korean forums is rampant. Far better to appreciate stage performances and study Go moves in peace.
还有一个颇为讽刺的现象：国人在现实中遇到外国人，往往彬彬有礼、毕恭毕敬；一到网上，就用”美国佬””小日本””棒子国”之类的称呼阴阳怪气。
Another bitterly ironic spectacle: in physical encounters with foreigners, domestic citizens are unfailingly polite, deferential, and cordial; yet behind keyboards, they instantly resort to pejoratives like “Yankee,” “Little Japs,” or “Gao-li sticks.”
4、女足世界杯惨败与中国体育体制 The Women’s World Cup Debacle & the Chinese Sports System
这场比赛让人心态崩溃。赛前还以为是什么”铿锵玫瑰”，结果所有位置都被打爆，唯一的点球还是对方送的，简直像被《三体》中的二向箔降维打击了一样。身体条件并非借口——北方姑娘并不矮，但与英格兰球员站在一起仍矮大半个头。
This match was a psychological demolition. Heralded beforehand as the glorious “Steel Roses,” every position was systematically torn apart; our lone penalty goal was gifted by the opponent, feeling like a dimensional strike courtesy of the dual-vector foil in The Three-Body Problem. Physical conditioning provides no alibi—northern Chinese women are hardly short, yet standing beside English athletes, they were dwarfed by half a head.
更让人反感的是舆论的双重标准：踢得差就该接受批评，但舆论张口闭口”女足精神”，再不济也是”虽败犹荣”，然后拉上男足垫背，还在吹嘘”女足比男足强”，这是典型的阿Q精神。事实上，很多人根本不看比赛，也就看不到这场比赛暴露的问题。天天吹捧女足精神，把她们拔高到如此程度，最终结果只能是打脸。
What revolts me further is the double standard in public discourse: atrocious play warrants unsparing criticism, yet media incessantly parrot the “Steel Rose spirit,” sugarcoating humiliation as “glorious defeat,” dragging the men’s squad into the mud as scapegoats while boasting that “the women are still superior to the men”—the epitome of Ah Q’s psychological victories. In truth, most commentators never watch matches and remain oblivious to the tactical catastrophe exposed on the pitch. Incessantly canonizing this mythos to dizzying heights only ensures a harder slap in the face.
需要澄清的是所谓”亚洲杯冠军”的成色：亚太地区有六个世界杯名额，而真正拥有职业化建设的球队只有五支——很多国家根本不培养女足。从FIFA排名也能看出问题：中国女足位列第14（1854分），但前36名中亚洲只有中日韩越四个国家，前十名里一个都没有（数据来源：FIFA女足世界排名）。去年拿亚洲杯冠军时的沾沾自喜，实在没有根据。
The prestige of the “Asian Cup Championship” requires sober demystification: the Asia-Pacific confederation commands six World Cup berths, yet only five nations maintain genuine professional infrastructure—most countries invest zero resources into women’s soccer. FIFA rankings clarify the reality: China ranks 14th (1,854 points), yet across the global top 36, Asia fields merely four nations (China, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam), with zero representation inside the top ten (Source: FIFA Women’s World Rankings). The smug self-congratulation over winning the Asian Cup last year was utterly baseless.
深层原因在于培养体系。足球不像围棋那样只需要天才加高强度训练，它需要一整套培养体系。而中国的青训制度太差了——我从小到大生活在一座新一线城市，从未听说过任何关于足球、篮球、排球的训练选拔。对比欧美，人家中小学的体育课程设计满满当当，中国的小学体育课不被语数英占用就算胜利。上世纪末中国女足还能拿世界杯亚军，如今西方的训练方法不断前进，我们原地踏步，于是落到了小组赛出局的地步。
The root rot resides in developmental infrastructure. Unlike Go, which thrives on solitary genius plus brutal training regimens, football demands a comprehensive, institutionalized ecosystem. China’s youth academy system is dismal—growing up in a new first-tier metropolis, I never encountered a single scouting trial for football, basketball, or volleyball. Contrast this with Europe and the United States, where primary and secondary athletics curricula are rigorously packed; in China, a physical education period escaping cancellation by math, Chinese, or English teachers counts as a miracle. At the close of the last century, China’s women took World Cup silver; today, Western methodologies evolve continuously while we stagnate, deservedly crashing out in the group stage.
归根结底，中国从来没有强有力的市场化体育振兴举措。中国人最适合的是那种”选一批好苗子关在一个地方训练三五年就能出成绩”的冷门项目；但凡一个项目商业化程度高，我们就难以获得奖牌——举国体制就是这样的。反观韩国：2013至2018年的六年间，80%以上的围棋世界冠军被中国夺得；韩国国会随即在2019年实行了围棋振兴法，此后两年，无论顶尖层建设、新锐建设还是市场化建设都远好于中国。中国的一场围棋比赛，观众甚至不知道它什么时候能比完——这在韩国是不可能发生的。
Ultimately, China has never mounted robust, market-driven athletic revitalizations. Our strengths lie in esoteric Olympic events where “a cohort of promising youths can be locked in an enclave for three to five years to produce medals”; whenever a discipline achieves high commercialization, our podium hopes evaporate—such is the state-sponsored athletic machine (Juguo Tizhi). Consider South Korea: between 2013 and 2018, over 80% of world Go titles were claimed by China; the Korean National Assembly responded by passing the Baduk Promotion Act in 2019. Over the subsequent two years, Korea outpaced China dramatically across elite cultivation, grassroots youth development, and commercial operations. At a Chinese Go tournament, spectators may not even know when it will end—something that could not happen in Korea.
在举国体制转向之前，我认为很难有什么变化。
Until the state-sponsored sports apparatus undergoes systemic reform, I believe meaningful change will be difficult.
5、竞技体育的残酷 The Cruelty of Competitive Sports
看到韩国围棋选手申真谞掩面的画面，这是我此生最想拥抱 小申 的一次。甚至想同时捏住 妮可 和小申”命运的后颈”，让他们抱在一起取暖，告诉他们别再难过、只管朝前看——实在太不甘心了。接下来还有五天团体赛，我大概会发疯；至于他们会不会发疯，我也不知道。
Watching Korean Go player Shin Jin-seo bury his face in his hands, this was the moment in my life I most yearned to embrace Shin. I felt an urge to grab both Nicole and Shin by the scruff of their fates, pulling them together to share warmth, whispering to set sorrow aside and look solely forward—the grief was unbearable. With five days of team matches looming, I will likely go mad; whether they lose their minds as well, I cannot say.
翌日的自我剖白：我确实是因为 竞技体育的残酷性 才喜欢它，因此观赛时承受的一切痛苦，似乎都是我罪有应得。又有谁能永远赢下去？历史上不存在这样的人——强如 李昌镐 也做不到，何况后来者。
A self-confession the following day: it is precisely the merciless cruelty of competitive athletics that draws my devotion, meaning every drop of anguish suffered as a spectator is my just desert. Who can triumph indefinitely? History bears no such god—even a titan like Lee Chang-ho could not sustain invincibility, let alone those who follow.
想到之前看的韩剧《D.P.》，这部关于逃兵的剧太有意思了，不愧是同时拿下百想电视剧赏和青龙电视剧赏的剧集。
Reflecting on the Korean series D.P.: this series about military deserters is fascinating, worthy of winning both the Baeksang Arts Awards’ television prize and the Blue Dragon Series Awards’ television prize.
很难想象韩国社会割裂到这种程度——霸凌已经成为其社会文化的一部分。军队中的霸凌问题尤其离谱，全民征兵制难辞其咎：这种工作还是要以自愿为前提，才能保持战斗力。剧中那句台词极为深刻：霸凌这种东西，每一个旁观的人都负有与施暴者同等的责任。
It defies imagination how deeply fractured South Korean society has become—bullying has become part of its social culture. Abuse within the armed forces is particularly unhinged, largely indicting universal conscription: this work must be based on voluntary participation to preserve operational efficacy. A line from the drama echoes with profound moral weight: when it comes to bullying, every silent bystander shoulders equal culpability with the perpetrator.
虽然中国社会也有这样那样的问题，但我是真的不想生活在韩国——高考、财阀、兵役、霸凌，都太压抑了。
Though Chinese society wrestles with its own myriad ailments, I would never wish to live in South Korea—the college entrance examination, chaebols, mandatory military service, systemic bullying—the suffocating weight is simply overwhelming.
6、海飞杯裁判有感 Reflections of a Haifei Cup Referee
为了勤工俭学，2023年9月30日-10月2日我在威海举办的山东省围棋省赛（少儿组）担任裁判。一天下来的总结是：我今天不是去评判胜负的，是去当保姆的——心态崩了。
To earn work-study income, from September 30 to October 2, 2023, I served as a referee for the Shandong Provincial Go Championship (Youth Division) held in Weihai. My verdict after a single day: I was dispatched not to arbitrate victory and defeat, but to work as a babysitter—my mental state completely collapsed.
乱象四则 Four Chaotic Phenomena
其一，水平之差。如今的三段、四段选手技战术极差，感觉完全没受过训练，只凭基础规则就能在场上”大杀四方”，而这还是中游选手——我小学二年级就下得比他们强。
First: Abysmal technical caliber. Today’s 3-dan and 4-dan competitors exhibit appalling tactical comprehension, appearing entirely untrained, able to dominate games merely by knowing the basic rules—and these represent mid-tier contenders; I played with vastly superior sophistication in second grade.
其二，规则之乱。有人两次连下两手（在围棋中即等同认输）；有人执白却坐到了执黑的位置，输棋之后要求”重下一盘，因为我本该执白”——执黑执白在规则上完全等价，这种水平还妄想换边逆转乾坤。一点廉耻心都不要。
Second: Complete disregard for rules. One child played two consecutive stones without waiting for the opponent (an immediate forfeit in formal Go); another holding White sat in the Black seat, demanding a rematch upon defeat because “I was supposed to play White”—Playing Black or White is entirely equivalent under the rules, yet with such atrocious skill, they dreamed of reversing destiny by swapping colors. Utterly devoid of shame.
其三，数子之诈。本届用手机数子判定胜负，最为公正客观；遇复杂局面才改由人工手点。我给一盘棋点出 183 子、判其输，当事人死活不认，坚称软件有问题、要求手点——再点出来 186 子、他赢了。大概率是趁乱把桌上的三颗黑子摆回了棋盘。更根本的问题是：他们水平差到根本判断不出自己是输是赢。
Third: Outright score tampering. This tournament utilized smartphone camera apps to count territory, the most impartial method available; manual hand-counting was reserved for contested boards. I counted a board at 183 stones, declaring a loss; the child threw a tantrum, insisting the software was defective and demanding manual counting—the second count yielded 186 stones, declaring him victor. In all likelihood, amid the commotion, he took advantage of the commotion to put three black stones from the table back onto the board. More fundamentally: their skill is so pathetic that they cannot even gauge whether they have won or lost.
其四，裁判之盲。另一盘棋软件真出了故障，把本已险胜的黑棋误判为负，被判错的一方与被判赢的一方双双没有异议、马上就要签字——是我在旁边看出判罚有问题，另一位裁判才反应过来。那些裁判根本不会下棋，拿个软件就来执裁。少儿赛确实需要保姆型裁判，但总不能连胜负都判错。今天的两句话就是：”裁判不会围棋；裁判不需要会围棋。”
Fourth: Incompetence of referees. On another board, the scoring app legitimately glitched, incorrectly scoring a narrow Black victory as a defeat; astoundingly, neither the wronged child nor the erroneous victor objected, both poised to sign the score sheet—it was I who noticed the erroneous ruling from nearby, after which another referee finally realized the problem. Those arbiters possess zero Go literacy, armed merely with an app to officiate. Youth tournaments may well require babysitter-style stewards, but botching the very outcome of a match is inexcusable. My summary today: “Referees do not know Go; referees are not required to know Go.”
家长与”小朋友豁免权” Parents and the “Child Immunity Clause”
家长同样不堪：不懂棋却指手画脚。有个孩子明明输半目，我点了两遍，家长还过来搅局，指控我”移棋”——我是裁判，我移你的棋做什么？我难道不知道输半目有多难受吗？我上次比赛要是没输那盘，就是苏州第二了，印象极深。这就是公平，连这都不信，那请别人来当裁判好了。
Parents are equally intolerable: utterly ignorant of the game yet aggressive in interference. One child lost by half a point; after I counted twice, the parent barged in, accusing me of “displacing stones”—I am the referee, why would I tamper with your child’s stones? Do I not know the heartbreak of a half-point defeat? Had I not lost by half a point in my last championship match, I would have been runner-up in all of Suzhou. That is the nature of competitive fairness; if you distrust basic integrity, hire someone else to officiate.
至于”不要跟小朋友计较”的说法，我完全不接受：我当小朋友的时候为什么能表现好？ 小朋友的身份不是免死金牌，不是亵渎规则的通行证。不思考、作弊、跟规则较劲——一大堆。
As for the platitude “don’t hold children to adult standards,” I reject it wholesale: why was I capable of rigorous discipline when I was a child? Being a child is not an imperial pardon, nor a license to desecrate the rules. Intellectual laziness, cheating, defying regulations—the venue was overflowing with it.
今昔对比 Past vs. Present
我们那个年代的省赛，门槛是五段，且须经各市各区选拔、名额固定；如今则是个人就能报名，也配叫省赛。
In our era, provincial championships demanded a strict 5-dan prerequisite, screened through municipal and district qualifiers with capped quotas; today, any individual can sign up, debasing the title of a “provincial championship.”
段位的含金量更是不可同日而语。那时三段是一个台阶，意味着棋手已有自己的行棋风格；五段又是一个台阶，意味着各方面都无弱点、综合实力过硬——两者都极不容易拿到。我自己的升段轨迹是：一年级上学期一段，下学期二段，二年级三段，三年级四段，四年级五段。我想问的是：我二年级时的三段水平，放在今天这个赛场上有几个人能及？而如今的三段、四段，连自己是输是赢都判断不出来。
The gold standard of rank certificates has plummeted beyond comparison. Back then, 3-dan marked a major milestone, signifying an established, idiosyncratic playing style; 5-dan was a formidable summit, denoting a complete game devoid of structural vulnerabilities—both were arduously earned. My personal promotion trajectory: 1-dan in autumn of first grade, 2-dan in spring, 3-dan in second grade, 4-dan in third grade, and 5-dan in fourth grade. My question is simple: how many players in this arena could match my second-grade 3-dan caliber? Yet today’s 3-dans and 4-dans cannot even deduce their own win-loss standing.
对局态度同样今非昔比：给足一个半小时的用时，十几二十分钟便草草下完，下完之后还不知道谁赢谁输。
Attitudes toward play have also deteriorated in lockstep: allotted ninety minutes of game clock, they finish carelessly in fifteen to twenty minutes, standing up oblivious to who claimed the board.
结语 Coda
围棋是君子游戏，不要把下三滥的招数带进来——那是某些人搞体育比赛的做派，别和围棋扯上关系。我理想中的围棋，是此刻杭州亚运会赛场的样子：正襟危坐，有礼貌地打招呼、交朋友，下高质量的棋，对规则、对比赛、对彼此负责。而我眼前的围棋，是威海这场所谓的山东省省赛。
Go is a gentleman’s game; do not bring underhanded tactics into it—that is how certain people conduct sports competitions and has nothing to do with Go. My ideal of Go mirrors the Hangzhou Asian Games arena unfolding right now: seated upright with solemn decorum, greeting one another politely and making friends, producing masterly games, and holding sacred the rules, the contest, and one another. The Go before my eyes was this so-called Shandong provincial tournament in Weihai.
盛怒之下立誓两句（存档照录）：”我再也不会跟小朋友打交道了，不会再干与小朋友相关的工作。””成年人的分歧是世界观不同，成年人与小孩的分歧是是否有世界观。”
Two oaths sworn in fury (archived verbatim): “I will never deal with children again, nor accept any work involving them.” “Differences among adults stem from conflicting worldviews; differences between adults and children stem from whether a worldview exists at all.”
半小时后的余波：勤工俭学这点钱真不好赚。今天最大的感悟是——能与讲逻辑、讲礼貌、克制、理性、有人文情怀的人讲话，是何等难能可贵。太久没见到这种人，以致今天整个人生观都被颠覆了。
Aftermath thirty minutes later: Work-study money is bitter coin. Today’s paramount epiphany—how infinitely precious it is to converse with souls who embody logic, courtesy, restraint, reason, and humanistic sensibility. It had been so long since I encountered such grace that my entire worldview felt inverted today.